- Identifying and recognizing a wide range of methods of crime control in America—and effectively recalling during examinations these methods, their purpose, and their impact on society.
- Understanding various ways in which crime data is collected in the United States and how this affects what we know about policies and practices.
- Critically analyzing the literature concerning what works and doesn’t work in crime control and applying this knowledge to current U.S. crime control strategies with the purpose of considering the gaps between research and practice and the political nature of the criminal justice system.
- Critically analyzing what we know about the structure and effectiveness of established and cutting-edge policing strategies in diverse social institutions, such as schools—and creating evidence-based judgments in writing and public presentations about what policies and practices we should and should not do.
- Critically analyzing the gap between research and practice and why we rely heavily on tough-on-crime prosecution strategies, sentences, and prisons and creating evidence-based judgments in writing and public presentations about what policies and practices we should and should not do.
- Understanding crime control approaches at both a micro and macro level and applying in writing your understanding of them and of their collateral consequences on individuals, families, schools, and communities.
- Organizing and presenting data publically in an effort to draw policy relevant conclusions.
- Producing a policy report, which is consistent with the aims and goals of a graduate level course.
- review the Getting Started information located in the course content;
- introduce yourself to the class during the first week by posting a self-introduction in the appropriate discussion forum;
- take the Practice Quiz to ensure that your computer is compatible with Blackboard;
- interact online with instructor(s) and peers; and
- review and follow the course calendar.
- There are two exams for this course. Exams will cover material from lectures and assigned readings. Please review the course schedule for the dates and times of the exams. You will need to make sure ahead of time that you have the computer capability to take the exams online through Blackboard.
- There is one research project for this course where you will critically analyze and evaluate a criminal justice policy and make evidence-based recommendations. The project will be written as a policy brief. It will be uploaded through the Blackboard and it is subject to review by Turnitin.com.
- There is one required oral presentation of your research project. Depending on the type of class (i.e. online or hybrid), you will present to a virtual or live audience made up of your colleagues and myself. Your presentation will be graded using a rubric with a 5-point rating scale of six oral communication indicators. The purpose of the oral presentation is for you to demonstrate effective oral communication skills through your subject knowledge of criminal justice, organization of ideas, efficient delivery, and appropriate use of PowerPoint.
- The method of determining final grades is based on the following course requirements. The following grading scale will be used to determine your course grades:
General Information
Course Description And Purpose
This graduate seminar introduces students to the many methods of crime control and reviews the research concerning their effectiveness. The course covers policing, prosecution and courts, and legislative methods of crime control. Moreover, it spans beyond the justice system and examines the effectiveness of crime control at the school and community levels. The seminar also covers juvenile crime control, crime and punishment in America, and sociological explanations of large-scale crime trends. Finally, it covers the explanations (and consequences) of the US prison boom first witnessed during the 1970s and which continues today. Related to this last theme, the seminar will examine policymaking more generally and discuss how empirical information can and does get used (and sometimes misused) in current U.S. crime policy debates. By the end of the semester, you will be able to think analytically about crime and criminal justice, an intrinsically controversial and emotional topic, and understand how scientific information enters into the policymaking process.
Course Objectives
After successful completion of this course you will have developed the intellectual skills of:
Important Information
Policies
Please review the FIU's Policies webpage. The policies webpage contains essential information regarding guidelines relevant to all courses at FIU, as well as additional information about acceptable netiquette for online courses.
Student Misconduct:
FIU is a community dedicated to generating and imparting knowledge through excellent teaching and research, the rigorous and respectful exchange of ideas, and community service. All students should respect the right of others to have an equitable opportunity to learn and honestly to demonstrate the quality of their learning. Therefore, all students are expected to adhere to a standard of academic conduct, which demonstrates respect for themselves, their fellow students, and the educational mission of the University. All students are deemed by the University to understand that if they are found responsible for academic misconduct, they will be subject to the Academic Misconduct procedures and sanctions, as outlined in the Student Handbook.
Academic misconduct is a serious offense at FIU because it diminishes the quality of the scholarship and learning experience for everyone on campus. An act of academic misconduct, including cheating, plagiarism, misrepresentation, and classroom disruption (e.g., cell phones), may to lead to penalties such as a reduction in grade, probation, suspension, or expulsion. The term “plagiarism” includes, but is not limited to, the use by paraphrase or direct quotations, of the published or unpublished work of another person without full and clear acknowledgement. It also includes the unacknowledged use of materials prepared by another person or agency that may or may not be engaged in the selling of term papers or other academic materials.
Students agree that enrollment in this course constitutes permission that all required papers may be submitted to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism and that all submitted papers will be retained as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database and used solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Turnitin.com is an electronic resource that assists in the detection and deterrence of plagiarism by electronic comparison for textual similarity. All students are deemed by the University to understand that if they are found responsible for academic misconduct, they will be subject to the Academic Misconduct procedures and sanctions.
Incomplete Grade:
An incomplete grade is a temporary symbol given at the discretion of the professor for work not completed because of serious interruption not caused by the student’s own negligence. To be eligible, written documentation must be provided. The student also must have successfully completed half of the coursework with a passing grade. An incomplete must be made up as quickly as possible, but no later than two consecutive semesters after the initial taking of the course or it will automatically default to an “F” or the grade that the student earned in the course.
Technical Requirements & Skills
One of the greatest barriers to taking an online course is a lack of basic computer literacy. By computer literacy we mean being able to manage and organize computer files efficiently, and learning to use your computer's operating system and software quickly and easily. Keep in mind that this is not a computer literacy course; but students enrolled in online courses are expected to have moderate proficiency using a computer. Please go to the "What's Required" webpage to find out more information on this subject.
Please visit our Technical Requirements webpage for additional information.
Accessibility And Accommodation
Florida International University is committed to providing a working and learning atmosphere that reasonably accommodates qualified persons with disabilities. If you have any disability, which may impair your ability to complete this course successfully, please contact the Disability Resource Center (305-348-3532). Reasonable academic accommodations are reviewed for all students who have qualified, documented disabilities.
For detailed information about the specific limitations with the technologies used in this course, please click here.
For more information about Blackboard's Accessibility Commitment, click here.
For additional assistance please contact FIU's Disability Resource Center.
Expectations Of This Course
This is an online course, which means most (if not all) of the course work will be conducted online. Expectations for performance in an online course are the same for a traditional course. In fact, online courses require a degree of self-motivation, self-discipline, and technology skills which can make these courses more demanding for some students.
Students are expected to:
Textbook
Course Detail
Course Communication
Communication in this course will take place via Email.
I routinely email the class and will use your FIU email address by default. If you do not receive an email from me during the week before classes begin, check your spam folder. Also, let me know if you prefer that I use an alternative email address.
The Email feature is an external communication tool that allows users to send emails to users enrolled within the course. Emails are sent to the students’ FIU email on record. The Email tool is located on the Course Menu, on the left side of the course webpage.
Visit our Writing Resources webpage for more information on professional writing and technical communication skills.
Exams
Research Presentation
Policy Analysis Assignments
Grading
COURSE REQUIREMENTS | Points | % Value |
---|---|---|
Exam #1 | 100 | 20% |
Exam #2 | 100 | 20% |
Presentation of the Policy Report | 30 | 20% |
Policy Report | 30 | 30% |
Policy Analysis Assignment #1 | 10 | 5% |
Policy Analysis Assignment #2 | 10 | 5% |
Total | N/A | 100% |
LETTER | RANGE (%) | LETTER | RANGE (%) |
---|---|---|---|
A | 92.5%—100% | C+ | 77.5%—79.4% |
A- | 89.5%—92.4% | C | 69.5%—77.4% |
B+ | 87.5%—89.4% | D | 59.5%—69.4% |
B | 82.5%—87.4% | F | 00.0%—59.4% |
B- | 79.5%—82.4% |
Presentation Rubric
LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT Evaluators assign a one (1) to any measure that does not meet benchmark level performance |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark 2 |
Milestones 3 |
Milestones 4 |
Capstone 5 |
|
Organization | Very limited development of content; (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); little use/application of course concepts and terms to show knowledge of subject matter. | Adequate development of content; (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); some use of course concepts and terms to show knowledge of subject matter. | Competent development of content (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); appropriate use/application of course concepts & terms to show knowledge of subject matter. | Masterful development of content (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); shows comprehensive knowledge of subject matter through full use/application of course concepts and terms. |
Development | Paragraphs had little to no organization. Transitions were poor. Sequence of ideas is limited. | Some paragraphs were organized around topic sentences with some development. Some transitions were awkward. Sequence of ideas is adequate. | Most paragraphs were organized around topic sentences and were well developed. Most transitions were adequate. Sequence of ideas is competent. | All paragraphs were organized around topic sentences and fully developed. All transitions were used effectively. Sequence of ideas is effective. |
Research Integration | Few of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. Multiple sources were questionable. Few sources were smoothly integrated into the narrative. | Some of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. Several sources were questionable. Some sources were smoothly integrated into the narrative. | Most of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. A few sources were questionable. Most sources were smoothly integrated into the narrative. | All of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. Sources were seamlessly integrated into the narrative. |
Conclusions and Recommendations | Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. | Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. | Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. | Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. |
Style & Delivery | Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage. Repetitive words and sentence types. | Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors. | Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors. | Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free. |
PowerPoint | Neglects important sources. Overuse of quotations or paraphrase to substitute writer’s own ideas. Possibly uses source material without acknowledgement. | Uses relevant sources but lacks in variety of sources and/or the skillful combination of sources. Quotations & paraphrases may be too long or inconsistently referenced. | Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Does not overuse quotes, but may not always conform to required style manual. | Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t overuse quotes. Conforms to required referencing style. |
Written Communication Rubric
LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT Evaluators assign a one (1) to any measure that does not meet benchmark level performance |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark 2 |
Milestones 3 |
Milestones 4 |
Capstone 5 |
|
Content and Development | Very limited development of content; (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); little use/application of course concepts and terms to show knowledge of subject matter. | Adequate development of content; (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); some use of course concepts and terms to show knowledge of subject matter. | Competent development of content (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); appropriate use/application of course concepts & terms to show knowledge of subject matter. | Masterful development of content (focus, relevance, purpose, explanations); shows comprehensive knowledge of subject matter through full use/application of course concepts and terms. |
Research Integration | Few of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. Multiple sources were questionable. Few sources were smoothly integrated into the narrative. | Some of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. Several sources were questionable. Some sources were smoothly integrated into the narrative. | Most of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. A few sources were questionable. Most sources were smoothly integrated into the narrative. | All of the ideas, opinions and perspectives of others were from credible sources and appropriate to the development of the paper. Sources were seamlessly integrated into the narrative. |
Conclusions and Related Outcomes | Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. | Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. | Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. | Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. |
Organization | Paragraphs had little to no organization. Transitions were poor. Sequence of ideas is limited. | Some paragraphs were organized around topic sentences with some development. Some transitions were awkward. Sequence of ideas is adequate. | Most paragraphs were organized around topic sentences and were well developed. Most transitions were adequate. Sequence of ideas is competent. | All paragraphs were organized around topic sentences and fully developed. All transitions were used effectively. Sequence of ideas is effective. |
Control of Syntax and Mechanics | Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage. Repetitive words and sentence types. | Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors. | Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors. | Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free. |
Referencing/Citing Sources and Research | Neglects important sources. Overuse of quotations or paraphrase to substitute writer’s own ideas. Possibly uses source material without acknowledgement. | Uses relevant sources but lacks in variety of sources and/or the skillful combination of sources. Quotations & paraphrases may be too long or inconsistently referenced. | Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t overuse quotes, but may not always conform to required style manual. | Uses sources to support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t overuse quotes. Conforms to required referencing style. |
Course Calendar
Weekly Schedule
WEEK | TOPIC/TASK/ASSESSMENT | READINGS |
---|---|---|
Week 1 Jan. 7 - Jan. 13 |
Review of the Syllabus and the Course Content Violence in the United States Mass Incarceration |
Read: The Syllabus |
Week 2 Jan. 14 - Jan. 20 |
Measuring Violent Crime |
Read: Measuring Violent Crime & The Different Worlds of Violence in The Roots of Danger by Elliott Currie |
Week 3 Jan. 21 - Jan. 27 |
Explanations of Violent Crime that Fail |
Read: Explanations That Don’t Work in The Roots of Danger Read: Punishment’s Place: The Local Concentration of Mass Incarceration |
Week 4 Jan. 28 - Feb. 3 |
Explanations of Violent Crime that Work Social Problems and Social Change |
Read: Explanations That Work and the Conclusion in The Roots of Danger Read: The Dark Ghetto Revisited |
Week 5 |
*Exam #1: Opens on February 4th at 9:00am and closes on February 10th at 11:59pm | -------- |
Week 6 |
Analytical Lens and Criminal Justice Policy |
Read: Chapters 1 and 2 in Criminal Justice Policy: Origins and Effectiveness |
Week 7 |
Drug Policy |
Read: Chapters 3 and 5 in Criminal Justice Policy: Origins and Effectiveness |
Week 8 |
Juvenile Justice |
Read: Chapters 6 and 7 in Criminal Justice Policy: Origins and Effectiveness |
Week 9 |
Mass Incarceration |
Read: Chapters 8 and 10 in Criminal Justice Policy: Origins and Effectiveness |
Week 10 Mar. 11 - Mar. 17 |
Spring Break | -------- |
Week 11 Mar. 18 - Mar. 24 |
Human Trafficking |
Read: Chapters 12 and 13 in Criminal Justice Policy: Origins and Effectiveness |
Week 12 |
Correctional Treatment and Rehabilitation |
Read: Chapters 14 and 15 in Criminal Justice Policy: Origins and Effectiveness |
Week 13 |
Exam #2: Opens on April 1st at 9:00am and closes on April 7th at 11:59pm |
-------- |
Week 14 |
Guide to Writing a Policy Brief | -------- |
Week 15 |
Policy Report due April 21st by 11:59pm |
-------- |